On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 18:12 +0000, Keith W wrote: > Hello all, > > I believe we reached agreement on the following thread [1] that we would > reorganise trunk (to support independent component releases) once the 0.32 > was branched. > > Justin previously published a source tree layout proposal. I have just > extended it to include the Java subtree too. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Source+tree+layout+proposal > > As 0.32 is branched (and at the voting stage), is there anything that > blocks us from beginning the re-org task? Are there comments on the > proposed layouts? > > I am ready to work with other committers to help make sure the transition > is a smooth one. > > cheers, Keith. > > > [1] > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22Re%3A+Any+ETA+on+a+QPid+0.32+release%22&o=newest
Looks good but one request: can we please call the sub-directories proton, dispatch, cpp, jms ... NOT qpid-proton, qpid-dispatch, qpid-cpp... The repo is already called qpid, it has a (redundant) top level directory called qpid, lets not make everybody type qpid/qpid/qpid- first thing every morning. Cheers, Alan. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
