On 17 March 2015 at 15:45, Alan Conway <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 18:12 +0000, Keith W wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I believe we reached agreement on the following thread [1] that we would >> reorganise trunk (to support independent component releases) once the 0.32 >> was branched. >> >> Justin previously published a source tree layout proposal. I have just >> extended it to include the Java subtree too. >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Source+tree+layout+proposal >> >> As 0.32 is branched (and at the voting stage), is there anything that >> blocks us from beginning the re-org task? Are there comments on the >> proposed layouts? >> >> I am ready to work with other committers to help make sure the transition >> is a smooth one. >> >> cheers, Keith. >> >> >> [1] >> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=subject:%22Re%3A+Any+ETA+on+a+QPid+0.32+release%22&o=newest > > Looks good but one request: can we please call the sub-directories > proton, dispatch, cpp, jms ... > NOT > qpid-proton, qpid-dispatch, qpid-cpp... > > The repo is already called qpid, it has a (redundant) top level > directory called qpid, lets not make everybody type qpid/qpid/qpid- > first thing every morning. > > Cheers, > Alan. >
Agreed. I think theyd only want to have qpid- if they were in git, like qpid-proton and qpid-jms. The existing second qpid dir will go away with these changes either way though since it is within the trunk dir currently, and these proposed new dirs would contain the trunk etc. Robbie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
