> On Jan. 25, 2016, 2:42 p.m., Gordon Sim wrote:
> > proton-c/src/events/event.c, line 140
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42647/diff/1/?file=1205465#file1205465line140>
> >
> >     It would be worth a comment here explaining why PN_INTERRUPT is a 
> > special case.

PN_REACTOR_INTERRUPT please!


> On Jan. 25, 2016, 2:42 p.m., Gordon Sim wrote:
> > proton-c/src/events/event.c, line 385
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42647/diff/1/?file=1205465#file1205465line385>
> >
> >     I'd be inclined to make this a reactor scoped event i.e. 
> > PN_REACTOR_INTERRUPT

I should read ahead.


> On Jan. 25, 2016, 2:42 p.m., Gordon Sim wrote:
> > proton-c/src/posix/selector.c, line 68
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42647/diff/1/?file=1205466#file1205466line68>
> >
> >     Would be safer to set the fds to -1 after closing.

INVALID_SOCKET on windows, -1 is a posixism.


On Jan. 25, 2016, 2:42 p.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
> > Since the interrupt is now essentially a special method on the reactor, 
> > EventInjector as a separate, user-visiable class doesn't make as much sense 
> > in my view. I'd be inclined to try and merge it into Container.

I am confused by the event injector. Why is it injecting a proton event? What 
event type does it have? I would have expected to simply inject a callable 
object that will be executed in the correct context, or at least an event with 
a specific APPLICATION_EVENT type to which I could attach my own code or data. 
Why would I disguise an application event as if it came from proton?


- Alan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/42647/#review116070
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 22, 2016, 8:11 a.m., Cliff Jansen wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/42647/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 22, 2016, 8:11 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for qpid, Alan Conway, Andrew Stitcher, Gordon Sim, and Justin 
> Ross.
> 
> 
> Bugs: PROTON-1071
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1071
> 
> 
> Repository: qpid-proton-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Wrote new thread safe primitives for reactor and selector for Windows and 
> adapted the existing posix self-pipe mechanism to the changed API.
> 
> Reworked the Python EventInjector to use these primitives via special swig 
> functions.
> 
> Updated the io.h documentation to reflect the more conservative thread 
> guarantee.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   examples/python/db_recv.py 8c79049 
>   examples/python/db_send.py c07dcc0 
>   proton-c/bindings/python/cproton.i 734069f 
>   proton-c/bindings/python/proton/reactor.py 195ff28 
>   proton-c/include/proton/event.h 16d2bda 
>   proton-c/include/proton/io.h 19dfe53 
>   proton-c/include/proton/reactor.h e91b169 
>   proton-c/include/proton/selector.h c942393 
>   proton-c/src/events/event.c 5ad718e 
>   proton-c/src/posix/selector.c 7f72c84 
>   proton-c/src/reactor/reactor.c 7ea279b 
>   proton-c/src/windows/iocp.h 0e052e5 
>   proton-c/src/windows/iocp.c 404dd36 
>   proton-c/src/windows/selector.c f139aec 
>   tests/python/proton_tests/reactor.py 6ee107d 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42647/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> rhel7, windows8
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Cliff Jansen
> 
>

Reply via email to