On 25/02/16 20:41, Ted Ross wrote:
I could live with this. The only problem is that "type" is reserved by the AMQP management spec to describe the entity-type. We would need to qualify it in some way (this problem exists in my proposal as well).
That is a shame. Is 'class' reserved? It could be an alternative to type that is still fairly familiar as a term ('category' might be another).
I think 'treatment' is pretty descriptive in that it describes how the router treats the links and deliveries it gets from the endpoints.
It is descriptive, I agree. It just feels a little peculiar to me for probably the most visible/important of the fields. Not a huge issue (and I may get over it!).
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
