On 25/02/16 21:18, Ted Ross wrote:

On 02/25/2016 03:57 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
  - if you need separate in/out treatments, split the waypoint into a
source/sink pair for the same address. That is less confusing because
the "half-route" only has one message flow direction so no need for
inFoo/outFoo. It makes the config a little more verbose but this is a
complex use case.

I prefer the second for clarity and future-proofing. It means we can
add future options that might be set differently for inbound/outbound
without multiplying inFoo/outFoo, inBar/outBar on the route.

This makes sense to me.  It significantly reduces the number of
attributes of a route and still keeps the most common cases simple.

I agree.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to