On 25/02/16 21:18, Ted Ross wrote:
On 02/25/2016 03:57 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
- if you need separate in/out treatments, split the waypoint into a
source/sink pair for the same address. That is less confusing because
the "half-route" only has one message flow direction so no need for
inFoo/outFoo. It makes the config a little more verbose but this is a
complex use case.
I prefer the second for clarity and future-proofing. It means we can
add future options that might be set differently for inbound/outbound
without multiplying inFoo/outFoo, inBar/outBar on the route.
This makes sense to me. It significantly reduces the number of
attributes of a route and still keeps the most common cases simple.
I agree.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]