Github user ganeshmurthy commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/101#discussion_r80103666
  
    --- Diff: src/message.c ---
    @@ -787,44 +787,103 @@ static void send_handler(void *context, const 
unsigned char *start, int length)
         pn_link_send(pnl, (const char*) start, length);
     }
     
    +/**
    + * Returns true if the data backing the iterator matches any of the router 
specific annotations like "x-opt-qd.ingress" or
    + * "x-opt-qd.trace" or "x-opt-qd.to" or "x-opt-qd.phase
    + */
    +static bool qd_message_is_router_annotation(qd_field_iterator_t *iter)
    --- End diff --
    
    I failed to read the doc for qd_field_iterator_prefix. I have used it now 
instead of qd_message_is_router_annotation


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to