[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15800925#comment-15800925
]
Robbie Gemmell commented on QPID-7605:
--------------------------------------
Ah ok, I was thinking with the addition of the capability the server would only
do it if it knew the client desired/understood the behaviour. Obviously doing
so is really no different than just sending the property without any
capabilities involved, so that makes sense.
So yes, it essentially boils down to simplicity of the property vs more
symmetry with the attach through modifying the container-id.
> [Java Broker] [AMQP1.0] Container id uniqueness
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-7605
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7605
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java Broker
> Reporter: Keith Wall
> Fix For: qpid-java-7.0
>
>
> The AMQP 1.0 protocol layer implementation must ensure that the AMQP Open
> performative container-id is unique amongst existing established connections.
> As the JMS client id maps to the container-id, so this will fulfil the JMS
> requirement.
> https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/jms/Connection.html#setClientID-java.lang.String-
> Note that the Qpid JMS Client requires the Close performative with an Error
> containing a hint to generate to correct JMS exception. How will the Qpid
> Broker know to do this?
> org.apache.qpid.jms.integration.FailedConnectionsIntegrationTest#testConnectWithInvalidClientIdThrowsICIDEWhenInvalidContainerHintPresent
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
