[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15801444#comment-15801444
]
Rob Godfrey commented on QPID-7605:
-----------------------------------
Yes - the optional vs. mandatory thing would probably require a rev bump to
1.0.1 (we should really start collecting all the little annoyances like this).
On the Property... interesting... would be nice to be able to track that
down... maybe I'll do some searching over my archive of JIRA mails (unless you
saw this somewhere non-public)
> [Java Broker] [AMQP1.0] Container id uniqueness
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-7605
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7605
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java Broker
> Reporter: Keith Wall
> Fix For: qpid-java-7.0
>
>
> The AMQP 1.0 protocol layer implementation must ensure that the AMQP Open
> performative container-id is unique amongst existing established connections.
> As the JMS client id maps to the container-id, so this will fulfil the JMS
> requirement.
> https://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/api/javax/jms/Connection.html#setClientID-java.lang.String-
> Note that the Qpid JMS Client requires the Close performative with an Error
> containing a hint to generate to correct JMS exception. How will the Qpid
> Broker know to do this?
> org.apache.qpid.jms.integration.FailedConnectionsIntegrationTest#testConnectWithInvalidClientIdThrowsICIDEWhenInvalidContainerHintPresent
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
