Github user kcc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/95
on oss-fuzz we use adapters between e.g. AFL and LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput.
See e.g.
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Fuzzer/afl/afl_driver.cpp
So, a fuzzer does not have to be compatible out of the box, but it should
be possible to implement an adapter. (usually it is).
> It's not as if this function is useful to compile unless there is a
fuzzer present.
This is what I am trying to explain: this function *is* useful even if
there is no fuzzing engine
linked to it. If there is a good corpus of inputs this function can and
should be used for regression testing by linking it to a simple driver, e.g.
[this
one](https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Fuzzer/standalone/StandaloneFuzzTargetMain.c)
> So I don't really buy that argument.
Which one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
