[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16100125#comment-16100125
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on DISPATCH-767:
-----------------------------------------
Github user ChugR commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/pull/177#discussion_r129306967
--- Diff: src/buffer.c ---
@@ -83,7 +85,26 @@ size_t qd_buffer_size(qd_buffer_t *buf)
void qd_buffer_insert(qd_buffer_t *buf, size_t len)
{
buf->size += len;
- assert(buf->size <= buffer_size);
+ assert(buf->size <= BUFFER_SIZE);
+}
+
+void qd_buffer_add_fanout(qd_buffer_t *buf)
+{
+ buf->fanout++;
--- End diff --
Is this called with a lock held? Otherwise probably needs to be atomic
increment.
> Message Cut-Through/Streaming for efficient handling of large messages
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DISPATCH-767
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DISPATCH-767
> Project: Qpid Dispatch
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Router Node
> Reporter: Ted Ross
> Assignee: Ganesh Murthy
> Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> When large, multi-frame messages are sent through the router, there is no
> need to wait for the entire message to arrive before starting to send it
> onward.
> This feature causes the router to route the first frame and allow subsequent
> frames in a delivery to be streamed out in pipeline fashion. Ideally, the
> memory usage in the router should only involve pending frames. This would
> allow the router to handle arbitrary numbers of concurrent arbitrarily large
> messages.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
