jiridanek commented on pull request #318: URL: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/318#issuecomment-855754737
> I think that the cffi binding should be a drop in replacement for import cproton as there a number of places where this is used. My thinking was that the `cproton` module is internal API that does not have to be preserved. The only external use of the API that I am aware of are these two tests in Qpid Dispatch, https://github.com/apache/qpid-dispatch/search?l=Python&q=cproton It does sound plausible to me that your suggested approach would mean less work and less chance of error, though. I will discuss this with @SudhanAruna more. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
