If we only have resources for testing two, I believe one should be the default level. That’s the one that matters most.
The most time consuming build would be good to add if we become more resource efficient or have more resources in the future. But since it’s never useful in benchmarks, why bother with it now? > On Jun 8, 2016, at 21:26, Zuyu Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > > We could add the other two options if all CI tests finish in a reasonable > time frame, say 2 hours. > > This is a trade-off between the development and the tests. > > Historically, the CI takes too long to finish due to the limited concurrent > jobs, so we choose to build two copy elision level options: the least and > the most time consuming one.
