OK, I’ll put in a PR once the clang/gcc failures are resolved.
> On Jun 8, 2016, at 21:43, Jignesh Patel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Great idea Nav. I have no objections.
>
> Cheers,
> Jignesh
>
>> On Jun 8, 2016, at 8:45 PM, Navneet Potti <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I noticed that we only run Travis with copy elision levels set to the two
>> non-default cases. The default case, which is also the only one that’s
>> turned out to be useful in the benchmarks, is not being tested at all. Does
>> anyone know why? Any objections to changing that?
>
