Hi Julian,

Good point. To clarify. I was only going to copy the copyright into the root 
NOTICE file, and leave the files completely untouched. So, they wouldn’t have 
the Apache header in the source files. Only our files would have the new Apache 
Copyright template. 

Also, I think if it makes sense to the Quickstep mentors, and such a thing 
doesn’t exist, I’m happy to put together a document on what common 
tasks/problems that incubator community members face, and how to proactively 
pre-empt them. That may reduce the workload on the incubator mentors in the 
future. I do have a working scratch pad where I have been noting things and can 
clean them up in a few weeks when I think it will be clear that we have gotten 
past at least the first set of methods for doing things the ASF way. It will be 
a sequential checklist, so hopefully easy to follow, and hard to mess up.

Cheers,
Jignesh 

> On Jun 15, 2016, at 1:15 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> If the code in third_party is merely “copied” into the project and not part 
> of it, and in particular if have not forked it and intend to copy in a more 
> recent version in the future, maybe you shouldn’t be applying Apache headers 
> to those files. They could be just included in the source distribution 
> (including appropriate licenses and notices).
> 
> Other mentors, what do you think?
> 
> Julian

Reply via email to