On Jun 8, John Clements wrote:
>
> Followup: I renamed DrScheme to DrRacket without incident.
> [...]
I changed two more references -- specifically, having a [[DrScheme]]
reference that goes back to the same place looked redundant.
> A couple of questions:
>
> 1) In sentences such as "DrScheme is a part of PLT Scheme", I'm
> guessing this should turn into "DrRacket is a part of the Racket
> project", or something similar.
Yeah, that sounds reasonable.
> 2) More generally, it appears that "PLT Scheme" should be replaced
> with "Racket", meaning that the PLT disappears. Yes?
It should stay around since the group name is still PLT, no?
> 3) The examples on the wikipedia page are utterly loathsome, leaving
> the reader with the impression that "hello world" requires ten
> lines of GUI garbage.
Yeah, I had a similar reaction in the past. That would be nice to
change too, if you have the energy to do so...
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
