On Jun 23, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > To clarify, I'm proposing that this be a part of the "core"
I agree with this goal and the name. We could call it 'collections' hierarchy as in Java, but I don't think that this is a good name. Ideally, I'd like to call it data-structure but that isn't a good path element. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
