On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > At the Northeastern PLT lunch today, I proposed adding a top-level > `data' collection, for all manner of data structures.
Based on the discussion, here's the plan: In the next few days: 1. I will create a `data' collection, with subcollections `data/dict', `data/list', `data/set', `data/vector' re-exporting `racket/*' 2. I will change the Reference to refer to `data/*' instead of `racket/*' for these collections. - This will not change the exports of any existing library. In the slightly longer term: 3. I will propose moving some or all of the following collections from `unstable/<n>' to `data/<n>': set, hash, dict, queue, list, skip-list, interval-map (in a separate email discussion) After that: 4. We will discuss whether Typed Racket should be part of the "core", and thus whether its data structures should go in `data'. 5. Whether we want any other data structures to be added/migrated. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
