Look up the 'paren-shape stx property. Jay
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi <s...@cs.brown.edu> wrote: > That does sound like the right level, in that this isn't a new > "language" -- by design. > > I started out by trying to create a new syntax; then I realized I > didn't need to; then that I didn't *want* to. By then I was locked > into this file structure and didn't come up for air. I probably > didn't peel off enough layers. > > Before I can move forward, I still need to resolve the syntactic > ambiguity. As I understand it, Racket doesn't give me enough > information to distinguish {...} from (...) from [...]. Is that right > and, if so, is there any chance that will change? [Zodiac did that > <-;.] I don't want a solution that looks like "go look in the MrEd > buffer for...". I'd rather not do a reader extension for it because > the extra keystrokes will add up. > > Shriram > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > -- Jay McCarthy <j...@cs.byu.edu> Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://teammccarthy.org/jay "The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93 _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev