On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:47 AM, Robby Findler wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote:
>> IMO, this thing is missing the point (the usual "parens, ewww!" one),
>> as long as it ignores infix.
> Seems to me that this point directly contradicts one of Shriram's
> design goals, namely showing that + is no more special than append or
> one of your own functions.

That may be true, but it doesn't counter Eli's point, which I think is entirely 
valid.  I had precisely the same reaction when I saw that code.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

  For list-related administrative tasks:

Reply via email to