On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:47 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: >> IMO, this thing is missing the point (the usual "parens, ewww!" one), >> as long as it ignores infix. > > Seems to me that this point directly contradicts one of Shriram's > design goals, namely showing that + is no more special than append or > one of your own functions.
That may be true, but it doesn't counter Eli's point, which I think is entirely valid. I had precisely the same reaction when I saw that code. John
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev