On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:58 PM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>> (g1)
> #<continuation>
> #<continuation>
> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>
> where the print-values display of the continuation function appears to
> be printing twice. I guess I'm trying to understand what DrScheme is
> doing, well enough that I can duplicate this behavior in WeScheme, but
> I'm a bit baffled.
Do you mean to say
".. as opposed to the Racket repl or the DrRacket repl when (g1) is entered
individually?"
Posing the question like this suggests that the difference is in the load
process, which has an invisible continuation at the end of the three (g1)'s.
But I could be way off here.
;; ---
I'd write your code like this:
#lang racket
(define (make-gen gen)
(define resume-point (box #f))
(define (result-of-make-gen)
(let/cc caller-of-result-of-make-gen
(define (return v)
(let/cc caller-of-return
(set-box! resume-point caller-of-return)
(caller-of-result-of-make-gen v)))
;; -- IN --
(cond
[(unbox resume-point) => (lambda (f) (f caller-of-result-of-make-gen))]
[else (gen return)])))
;; -- IN --
result-of-make-gen)
(define g1 (make-gen (lambda (return)
(return "a")
(return "b")
(return "c"))))
(g1)
(g1)
(g1)
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
