On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote: > Understood. However, I think Danny's only concern w/ this code (which > I wrote, so don't blame him) is as a test case for WeScheme/Racket > compatibility in the presence of continuations.
Understood, too. So, do you want WeScheme/Racket compatibility or WeScheme/DrRacket compatibility? My proposal would be for Danny's implementation to satisfy Matthew's test suite for Racket. The second step would be to study to what extent DrRacket has a test suite for this kind of behavior and match the WeScheme editor/repl to those tests from DrRacket that you care about. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
