Conveniently, however, it isn't the broken one that we used here. Whew.

Robby

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:56 PM, namekuseijin <namekusei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Carl Eastlund <c...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:12 PM, namekuseijin <namekusei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:48 PM, John Clements
>>> <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote:
>>>> So, if I'm reading this correctly, we've gone from ~590K lines of C to 
>>>> about ~340K lines of C. That's amazing.
>>>
>>> hope that doesn't mean more obfuscated C code, though... :p
>>
>> Unfortunately, it does.  It's all hidden under layers of parentheses
>> and strange names with characters like "-" and "?" in them.
>> Completely unreadable.  Not a curly brace in sight, and I think it
>> just ignores all the semicolons.
>
> sounds like Greenspun's Tenth Rule... ;)
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>
_________________________________________________
  For list-related administrative tasks:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to