Conveniently, however, it isn't the broken one that we used here. Whew. Robby
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:56 PM, namekuseijin <namekusei...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Carl Eastlund <c...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 2:12 PM, namekuseijin <namekusei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:48 PM, John Clements >>> <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: >>>> So, if I'm reading this correctly, we've gone from ~590K lines of C to >>>> about ~340K lines of C. That's amazing. >>> >>> hope that doesn't mean more obfuscated C code, though... :p >> >> Unfortunately, it does. It's all hidden under layers of parentheses >> and strange names with characters like "-" and "?" in them. >> Completely unreadable. Not a curly brace in sight, and I think it >> just ignores all the semicolons. > > sounds like Greenspun's Tenth Rule... ;) > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
