Go, Matthew! :) Slay the evil beast. Robby
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > At Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:48:43 -0700, John Clements wrote: >> I took a look at the size of our C code base (all files ending in .c, .h, >> .cpp, and .cxx, not including those with 'xsrc' in the path) to see how much >> smaller gracket2 is, and (assuming I didn't miss something major) the >> difference is truly impressive. The below is ... | wc | sort -n | tail, so >> it's just the 9 biggest and the total from each. >> >> So, if I'm reading this correctly, we've gone from ~590K lines of C to about >> ~340K lines of C. That's amazing. > > In one way, you undercounted: ".cc" was used for about 55k lines of C++ > code. > > At the same time, it's overcounting to include the libpng, libjpeg, > etc. sources that we have in our repo for convenience. GRacket2 still > depends on those libraries, but it either uses the versions that you > have installed or uses binaries that are downloaded during a build. > > I would break it down like this: > > C & C++ that we C & C++ included Total > maintain [*] for convenience [**] > > GRacket1 455k 190k 645k > GRacket2 252k 85k 337k > > * Racket run-time: 227k (including 15k for GCs) > GUI (gr1 only): 197k > MysX, MzCom, SrP: 25k > > ** Image parsers (gr1 only): 105k > Boehm GC and libffi: 85k > > Overall, GRacket2 replaces about 200k lines of C and C++ (on top of Xt, > Win32, and Carbon) with about 30k lines of Racket code (on top of Gtk, > Win32, and Cocoa) plus Cairo and Pango. > > _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev