On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:42 AM, Robby Findler wrote: > But this seems to perhaps be developing into something more > interesting. Maybe there is something more general than contracts and > we should have a contracts+X system that supports that, somehow.
Every time I discuss contracts with a visiting researcher, the first or second thing they always ask is, "What if you coerced to a good value instead of throwing an error?", so I'm not surprised that Jay indeed wants just that. I think he's just found an excellent first use case for it in our own system, and so now we should take a look at supporting such, as you have said above. Stevie _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
