At Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:25:57 -0600, Robby Findler wrote: > I think I need more help to understand the programming problem better.
Isn't Jay just saying that he needs contract-like things to implement interoperability (among modules that have different representations of XML/HTML)? Ok, maybe he shouldn't call them "contracts", but all the contract-like infrastructure is currently called "contracts". Is there a way to reuse that infrastructure and not call them "contracts"? _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
