Positive suggestions for improvement are welcome. Bad analogies that don't help are like someone coming over to your house and hitting you with hammer before you even get a chance to have some coffee.
Robby On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > 5 minutes ago, Casey Klein wrote: >> >> For anyone following at home, the change turns this message [...] > > Ah, so that's what broke enough tests to make the build log explode... > > >> into this one >> >> /Users/clklein/tmp/contract-violator.rkt:9.17: found a contradiction >> between the contract (-> any/c any/c any/c) on #:equiv argument of >> test--> for >> (file /Users/clklein/tmp/contract-violator.rkt) >> and its implementation; expected a procedure that accepts 2 mandatory >> arguments without any keywords, given: 1; to fix adjust either the >> contract or the implementation of >> (file /Users/clklein/tmp/contract-violator.rkt) > > (Not that my opinion should count for more than 5% of a vote, but this > is IMO pretty horrible. It makes it even more difficult to get to the > important details, by wrapping them in text that looks like ... a > contract. Feels like the same annoying thing of digging through 10 > pages of a rent contract for the few places that list how you're being > robbed.) > > -- > ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: > http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
