All of this discussion suggests that we start developing RacketII, a language that is a true break from Scheme. Our backward compatibility constraints are just overwhelming our knowledge of what we know is 'bad' with Racket in relation to other languages.
Perhaps TR is the proper place to start such a 'clean-break' movement. -- Matthias _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
