On Sunday, December 12, 2010, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > All of this discussion suggests that we start developing RacketII, a language > that is a true break from Scheme. Our backward compatibility constraints are > just overwhelming our knowledge of what we know is 'bad' with Racket in > relation to other languages. > > Perhaps TR is the proper place to start such a 'clean-break' movement.
That sounds like a good thought to me, but I'd hate to have to port to a new language to be able to get type checking. Robby > -- Matthias > > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
