At Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:39:33 -0800,
John Clements wrote:
> Taking a step back:  is there really anything wrong with such commits?  Given 
> that drdr and e-mail alerts are based on pushes rather than commits, it seems 
> not unreasonable to just let those be intermediate commits.  I can see that 
> it's a bit easier to give a nice name to a single big commit, but if the 
> alternative is the fancy dance that this thread is suggesting, it seems like 
> it might be simpler just to go with the simple solution (tautology alert)

git bisect is less useful if some commits are broken states.

  For list-related administrative tasks:

Reply via email to