I often write (for.... ([i (in-range N)]) ...)
In cases where the loop overhead is not significant (i.e., I don't care whether the compiler can tell that I'm iterating through integers), it would be nice to write just (for.... ([i N]) ...) which would require that integers are treated as sequences. Would anyone object to making an exact, nonnegative integer `N' a sequence equivalent to `(in-range N)'? _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
