Two minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote: > FWIW, it would make sense to me if TR's regexp-match function > accepted only regexps in the first argument (ditto for Racket and > then Scracket could take strings (which of course are hashes mapping > integers to chars)).
I think that Sam's usual policy for that is to make things as close to Racket as possible. (And I think that it's a good policy in general.) As for Scratchit (obviously the right spelling), it does sound like a good idea, but the nice thing about the untyped -> TR route is that you get to keep your code, whereas a Scratchit thing would be useless if you can't use the libraries. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev