On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > I don't think the current cycle-checking cost is significant. Also, if > a program uses `assoc' on a list that's long enough for locality of the > turtle to matter, then it probably has bigger problems. But don't let > me stop you from experimenting!
Indeed, you're right. And now that I look at the code carefully, I see that it is implemented in a much better way than I had imagined. Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
