On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Neil Van Dyke <n...@neilvandyke.org> wrote:
> If, at the time this new "assq" makes it into a Racket release, the new
> "assq" turns out to be significantly slower than the old C one, can the old
> one ("kernel:assq"?) be exposed for programs to call directly?#lang racket (require (prefix-in kern: '#%kernel)) kern:assq -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
