On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > At Fri, 13 May 2011 17:38:41 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> The `syntax/stx' and `racket/private/stx' libraries contain a bunch of >> duplication. In particular, the following functions seem identical: >> `stx-null?' `stx-list?' `stx->list' `stx-pair?' `stx-car' `stx-cdr'. >> >> Is there any reason not to just have `syntax/stx' reprovide them, >> instead of defining duplicate versions? > > Seems fine to me. (Originally, the code in `racket/private/stx' wasn't > really accessible from `syntax/stx'.)
Were they in different programming languages, by chance? Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
