On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: >> At Fri, 13 May 2011 17:38:41 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >>> The `syntax/stx' and `racket/private/stx' libraries contain a bunch of >>> duplication. In particular, the following functions seem identical: >>> `stx-null?' `stx-list?' `stx->list' `stx-pair?' `stx-car' `stx-cdr'. >>> >>> Is there any reason not to just have `syntax/stx' reprovide them, >>> instead of defining duplicate versions? >> >> Seems fine to me. (Originally, the code in `racket/private/stx' wasn't >> really accessible from `syntax/stx'.) > > Were they in different programming languages, by chance?
I believe they used to be in `startup.ss', which was in Racket in most senses. Although with an interesting implementation ... -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
