On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > For a while I decided to try point-free programming. You can do it in > Racket as well as in Haskell. Then I ran across someone's rules for > writing Scheme and he had written > > (lambda (n) (+ x n)) > > is just as readable if not more than > > (curry + x) > > and often (not here) it is shorter. I tested it in my project and he's > right.
+1 to this choice! Robby _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
