Robby Findler wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Matthias Felleisen
<matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
For a while I decided to try point-free programming. You can do it in
Racket as well as in Haskell. Then I ran across someone's rules for
writing Scheme and he had written
(lambda (n) (+ x n))
is just as readable if not more than
(curry + x)
and often (not here) it is shorter. I tested it in my project and he's
right.
+1 to this choice!
I prefer
(λ (n) (+ x n))
CTRL-\ is one of my best friends when I use a lot of higher-order
functions in Racket. It just looks so clean.
Neil T
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
