> I see no reason to change `letrec'. Fixing internal definitions is the > goal; I didn't see (until Robby's suggestion) that fixing internal > definitions doesn't necessarily require a change to `letrec'.
This will also have the salutary effect of encouraging the use of internal definitions, which I think is a nicer programming style anyway! Shriram _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
