At Fri, 20 May 2011 14:25:54 -0700, John Clements wrote: > Perhaps this goes without saying, but I'm hoping that if internal > defines don't expand into letrec any more, that they expand into some > similar form that has syntactically obvious scoping; I like the fact > that the scope of letrec-declared variables is delimited by the > syntactic letrec term.
Yes. The goal as I see it is to preserve the syntax and scoping of internal definitions (since lots of code relies on that), but to adjust the semantics of locations for internal-definition identifiers (which no code likely relies on). _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
