I think I understand you, but in that case it should report the undefined reference and stay on the repl, no?
Thanks everyone of the prompt answers. On 06/01/2011 08:37 PM, John Clements wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote: > >> My racket breaks if the following code is executed: >> >> (current-input-port (open-input-string "a")) >> >> with the following message: >> >> reference to undefined identifier: a > > ? > > That sounds like the right behavior to me, in an environment with a REPL. > That is, you set current-input-port to pull from the string "a", then you > drop into the REPL, which reads from stdin, producing the string "a", which > reads as a reference to the variable a. > > No? > > John Clements > -- Eduardo Bellani omnia mutantur, nihil interit. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
