Ahh, now I think I got it. Thanks again for the prompt reply.
On 06/02/2011 08:50 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Eduardo Bellani <ebell...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think I understand you, but in that case it should report the >> undefined reference and stay on the repl, no? > > The next thing after `a' on the port is end-of-file, so the REPL > decides that everything is done, and exits. > >> Thanks everyone of the prompt answers. >> >> On 06/01/2011 08:37 PM, John Clements wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 1, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Eduardo Bellani wrote: >>> >>>> My racket breaks if the following code is executed: >>>> >>>> (current-input-port (open-input-string "a")) >>>> >>>> with the following message: >>>> >>>> reference to undefined identifier: a >>> >>> ? >>> >>> That sounds like the right behavior to me, in an environment with a REPL. >>> That is, you set current-input-port to pull from the string "a", then you >>> drop into the REPL, which reads from stdin, producing the string "a", which >>> reads as a reference to the variable a. >>> >>> No? >>> >>> John Clements >>> >> >> >> -- >> Eduardo Bellani >> >> omnia mutantur, nihil interit. >> _________________________________________________ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >> > > > -- Eduardo Bellani omnia mutantur, nihil interit. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
