Hi all, I've seen some locations in the docs where a currently imaginary predicate is used as a contract.
e.g. the sleep function has a nonnegative-number? contract The same contract is often expressed as (and/c real? (not/c negative?)) in many locations. e.g. the get-extent method for snip%, methods for editor<%>, text%, etc. It seems like the imaginary contract should be replaced with an actual one. Should it be replaced by the combinator expression above in the docs or can a predicate be made for this [somewhat common] case? Cheers, Asumu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
