On 2011-06-10 13:11:51 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote: > I'm more in favor of using `(and/c real? (not/c negative?))'.
Stevie just pointed out that the following contract is equivalent and shorter: (>=/c 0) so I'll go with that. Cheers, Asumu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
