On Jul 16, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:53:59 -0500, Casey Klein wrote: >> FWIW, the big taints commit also changed the value of this expression: >> >> (let ([s #'x]) >> (equal? s >> (with-handlers ([exn:fail:syntax? (compose first >> exn:fail:syntax-exprs)]) >> (raise-syntax-error #f "message" s)))) > > That's intentional, although I don't think it's correctly documented > (and probably not yet implemented right) that syntax objects in an > `exn:fail:syntax' are always tainted. I'll work on that. > > The expression could be fixed for taints as > > (let ([s (syntax-taint #'x)]) > (equal? s > ....))
Will taint information show up in the syntax objects in the drr repl? _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
