On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > >> At Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:53:59 -0500, Casey Klein wrote: >>> FWIW, the big taints commit also changed the value of this expression: >>> >>> (let ([s #'x]) >>> (equal? s >>> (with-handlers ([exn:fail:syntax? (compose first >>> exn:fail:syntax-exprs)]) >>> (raise-syntax-error #f "message" s)))) >> >> That's intentional, although I don't think it's correctly documented >> (and probably not yet implemented right) that syntax objects in an >> `exn:fail:syntax' are always tainted. I'll work on that. >> >> The expression could be fixed for taints as >> >> (let ([s (syntax-taint #'x)]) >> (equal? s >> ....)) > > Will taint information show up in the syntax objects in the drr repl? >
It doesn't currently AFAICT. _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
