On 2011-07-27 4:17 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > No such alchemy exists, it's just intended as part of the conceptual > framework.
Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence, the VM would need to be changed as part of that work? > No, `struct->vector' uses the chaperoned accessors, but doesn't > represent their structure. OK. And there's nothing else that can expose that structure? > No. OK. Thanks, Tony _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev