On 2011-07-27 4:17 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> No such alchemy exists, it's just intended as part of the conceptual 
> framework.

Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence,
the VM would need to be changed as part of that work?

> No, `struct->vector' uses the chaperoned accessors, but doesn't
> represent their structure.

OK. And there's nothing else that can expose that structure?

> No.


  For list-related administrative tasks:

Reply via email to