On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Tony Garnock-Jones <to...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > On 2011-07-27 4:17 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> No such alchemy exists, it's just intended as part of the conceptual >> framework. > > Would it be fair to say that were such a thing to come into existence, > the VM would need to be changed as part of that work?
Yes. >> No, `struct->vector' uses the chaperoned accessors, but doesn't >> represent their structure. > > OK. And there's nothing else that can expose that structure? Right. -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
