6 minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Eli is right in principle. I sense that we are facing the same kind
> of problems we faced when we created mixins and then again when we
> created continuation marks. We need annotations time and again and
> they couple parts of our system more closely than necessary. Problem
> is, we don't seem to see or have an abstraction that eliminates this
> coupling.
Maybe a good (re-)start would be to specify the required functionality
more precisely? Maybe follow the recipe and start with short examples
of what's needed?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_________________________________________________
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
