On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Matthias Felleisen
<matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>
> Eli is right in principle. I sense that we are facing the same kind of 
> problems we faced when we created mixins and then again when we created 
> continuation marks.  We need annotations time and again and they couple parts 
> of our system more closely than necessary. Problem is, we don't seem to see 
> or have an abstraction that eliminates this coupling.

Aren't syntax properties precisely this abstraction?

-- 
sam th
sa...@ccs.neu.edu

_________________________________________________
  For list-related administrative tasks:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to