On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > Eli is right in principle. I sense that we are facing the same kind of > problems we faced when we created mixins and then again when we created > continuation marks. We need annotations time and again and they couple parts > of our system more closely than necessary. Problem is, we don't seem to see > or have an abstraction that eliminates this coupling.
Aren't syntax properties precisely this abstraction? -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev