Actually, it would probably make more sense to add fitting routines to the science collection. They are definitely more general than just plotting. And, the PLoT package only implements non-linear least squares fitting.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com>wrote: > On 09/29/2011 12:27 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > >> You're referring to the code that implements `fit', right? >> >> Shouldn't we just keep that until someone does the same thing that >> Neil has done for that code too? >> > > Yes. I'll likely convert that one as well, but not right now. I've got > quite a bit of experience with nonlinear function fitting, from another > graduate program, a lifetime ago. (Or 3-4 years ago. or whatever.) > > A 'fit' module that does polynomial and more general least-squares fitting, > linear and spline interpolation, and kernel density estimators would be > really handy in quite a few situations. > > (Heck, let's just incorporate williams/science while we're at it. Batteries > included!) > > Neil T > > ______________________________**___________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/**listinfo/dev<http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev> >
_________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
